Out of the three worlds, this time, which one can you hear? Which one appeals to you more? The fish’s saga, the floating leaves’ travelogue or the tall dry trees’ declaration?
Is it clear then that the fish is frantically slow and brokenly quick, dashing here and there, carrying a wide-eyed moustache-o message for one and all?
And that the floating leaves, united and wet, surge to take over the stick, the feather, the boat and the paddles? A spirit of wilfulness rises in every seemingly dead leaf that allows it to fade at its own pace… green, red, brown, and skeletal leaves speak a different language.
The tall dry trees say nothing that time can capture in the garb of winters, autumns, summers, springs or monsoons, for the tall dry trees declared it long back that it is all just one big movement, constant movement, and stays so whether you measure it or not.
Is it clear then that the trees are old masters and not just a reflection of our ideas?
Out of the three worlds, now, which one do you listen to? Which one swirls you as if on a joy ride? Which one’s too fast, which one’s too slow?
Which one? Or is there simply just one?
Thanks my dear friend! 🙂
Thank you so much! 😀
micro or macro entangled forever.
to me personally, i have grown to be amused with the macro. the saying goes “don’t miss the forest for the trees”. so yes the ‘whole of’ compostition approach for me. though by no degrees i appreciate the trees, leaves or the maheer (or is it a koi) any lesser.
composition – prompt – make me a graphic sketch with charcoal pencil. put in bare sturctures (trees), floating life (leaves), and a bit of qismat (koi) 😛